4 Unconventional Tips for a Successful Home Hospice Program

4 Unconventional Tips for a Successful Home Hospice Program

The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medication (AAHPM) Annual Assembly is the premier academic occasion for hospice and palliative medication professionals. The assembly presents a variety of academic periods, networking alternatives, and displays from main hospice and palliative care organizations. The 2025 Annual Assembly might be held in San Diego, California, from March 28-31. The AAHPM Summary Submission website is now open for submissions. The deadline for summary submissions is October 15, 2024. Summary submissions are peer-reviewed and chosen for presentation primarily based on their scientific benefit and relevance to the sphere of hospice and palliative medication.

The AAHPM Annual Assembly is a superb alternative to share your analysis and be taught from different hospice and palliative care professionals. The assembly presents quite a lot of academic periods on subjects resembling ache administration, symptom administration, bereavement care, and moral points in hospice and palliative care. The assembly additionally presents alternatives to community with different hospice and palliative care professionals and be taught concerning the newest services and products from main hospice and palliative care organizations.

If you’re concerned in hospice or palliative care analysis, we encourage you to submit an summary for the 2025 AAHPM Annual Assembly. The deadline for summary submissions is October 15, 2024. For extra details about the summary submission course of, please go to the AAHPM web site.

AAHPM Summary Submission 2025: Name for Proposals

Summary Submission Timeline

The AAHPM Summary Submission 2025 timeline is as follows:

  • Summary submission opens: [date]
  • Summary submission deadline: [date]
  • Notification of summary acceptance: [date]
  • Early registration deadline: [date]
  • Convention dates: [date] – [date]

Summary Submission Pointers

Authors are invited to submit abstracts for oral or poster displays on a variety of subjects associated to hospice and palliative medication. Abstracts needs to be not more than 300 phrases in size and may embrace the next data:

  • Title of the summary
  • Authors’ names and affiliations
  • Summary physique
  • Key phrases

Abstracts might be peer-reviewed by a panel of consultants in hospice and palliative medication. The evaluation course of might be primarily based on the next standards:

  • Originality and significance of the analysis
  • High quality of the analysis design and strategies
  • Readability and conciseness of the summary

Summary Submission Classes

Abstracts could be submitted within the following classes:

  • Analysis
  • Training
  • Medical Follow
  • Coverage and Advocacy

Authors are inspired to submit abstracts that deal with the next precedence areas:

Precedence Areas for Analysis

– Symptom administration on the finish of life
– Look after susceptible populations
– Advance care planning
– Palliative care integration
– Interdisciplinary collaboration

Precedence Areas for Training

– Hospice and palliative care training for healthcare professionals
– Public training about hospice and palliative care
– Interdisciplinary training
– Cultural competence
– Moral decision-making

Precedence Areas for Medical Follow

– Interdisciplinary crew care
– Symptom administration
– Advance care planning
– Care transitions
– Communication

Precedence Areas for Coverage and Advocacy

– Entry to hospice and palliative care
– Reimbursement for hospice and palliative care providers
– Public coverage on end-of-life care
– Advocacy for susceptible populations
– High quality of care

The Artwork of a Compelling Summary: Submission Pointers and Finest Practices

Submission Pointers

To make sure the very best high quality of abstracts for evaluation, AAHPM adheres to a complete set of submission pointers. These pointers are designed to offer a transparent and concise framework for researchers to current their work and promote a constant evaluation course of. Adhering to those pointers is crucial for profitable summary submission and presentation.

Finest Practices

Writing a Compelling Summary

The summary is the center of your submission, and its affect could make or break your probabilities of choice for presentation. Listed below are some key greatest practices to make sure a compelling and impactful summary:

  • Clearly State Your Speculation or Intention: Start your summary with a concise and particular assertion of your analysis query or speculation.
  • Describe Your Strategies and Outcomes Objectively: Present a short overview of your methodology and spotlight crucial outcomes with out overgeneralizing or drawing untimely conclusions.
  • Quantify Your Findings: Every time doable, use numerical information to help your claims and exhibit the importance of your findings.
  • Spotlight the Significance of Your Work: Clarify how your analysis contributes to the sphere and why it’s related to AAHPM’s mission.
  • Proofread Rigorously: Make sure that your summary is freed from grammatical errors, typos, and inconsistencies. First impressions matter, and a well-written summary displays positively in your work.
Summary Part Phrase Restrict
Title 25 phrases
Background and Targets 150 phrases
Strategies 150 phrases
Outcomes 150 phrases
Conclusions 50 phrases

Enhancing the Impression of Your Summary: Dissemination Methods

Maximizing Attain and Impression

To maximise the attain and affect of your summary, contemplate the next methods:

  1. Current on the AAHPM Convention: This gives a right away platform to share your analysis with attendees, community with consultants, and generate curiosity in your work.
  2. Publish within the AAHPM Journal: Submit your summary for consideration within the AAHPM Journal, which publishes cutting-edge analysis and views in hospice and palliative medication.
  3. Make the most of Social Media: Share your summary and convention attendance on social media platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn, utilizing related hashtags to attach with researchers, clinicians, and most of the people taken with hospice and palliative care.

Leveraging Partnerships

Collaborate with organizations and people to broaden the dissemination of your summary and have interaction a wider viewers.

  1. Skilled Associations: Attain out to skilled associations just like the Nationwide Hospice and Palliative Care Group (NHPCO) or the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medication (AAHPM) to discover alternatives for presenting or publishing your work.
  2. Media Retailers: Contact healthcare-focused media retailers to pitch your summary for inclusion in articles or press releases.
  3. Affected person Advocacy Teams: Accomplice with affected person advocacy teams to share your findings with these affected by hospice and palliative care, elevating consciousness and selling understanding.

Creating Extra Supplies

Develop supplementary supplies to reinforce the affect of your summary and make your analysis extra accessible.

Materials Advantages
Slideshow Presentation: Create a visually partaking slideshow presentation to accompany your summary at conferences or for on-line dissemination. Visually illustrate your findings and make them extra digestible for a broader viewers.
Analysis Transient: Develop a one-page analysis transient summarizing your summary’s key findings and implications. Present a concise and accessible overview of your analysis for fast reference and sharing.
Infographic: Create an infographic that visually represents your information and highlights your analysis’s affect. Interact audiences with visually interesting and simply comprehensible data.

A Deep Dive into the Evaluation Course of: Standards and Expectations

Evaluation Standards

Abstracts are evaluated primarily based on the next standards:

  • Significance: The summary ought to deal with an necessary subject or query in palliative medication.
  • Innovation: The summary ought to current new or revolutionary approaches to palliative care.
  • Rigor: The summary needs to be primarily based on sound analysis strategies and proof.
  • Readability: The summary needs to be written clearly and concisely, utilizing exact language and acceptable terminology.

Evaluation Course of

Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of consultants in palliative medication. The evaluation course of is double-blind, which means that reviewers have no idea the identification of the authors.

Every summary is scored on the 4 standards listed above. The scores are then averaged to find out the general rating for the summary. The best-scoring abstracts are chosen for presentation on the AAHPM convention.

Detailed Expectations for Innovation and Rigor

  • Innovation:** Abstracts ought to exhibit a transparent understanding of the present state of palliative medication and establish areas the place new or improved approaches are wanted. Proposals needs to be possible, with a transparent plan for implementation and analysis.
  • Rigor:** Abstracts needs to be primarily based on sound analysis strategies and proof. Research needs to be designed to reply a selected query or speculation, and the outcomes needs to be reported precisely and objectively.
    Facet of Rigor Expectations
    Analysis Design Research design needs to be acceptable for the analysis query and use acceptable strategies to gather and analyze information.
    Knowledge Assortment Knowledge needs to be collected utilizing legitimate and dependable strategies, with acceptable pattern measurement and sampling strategies.
    Knowledge Evaluation Statistical analyses needs to be performed appropriately and outcomes interpreted appropriately.
    Reporting Outcomes needs to be introduced clearly and concisely, with acceptable use of tables and figures.

    The Significance of Early Submission and Planning

    Submitting your summary early for the AAHPM convention in 2025 presents quite a few benefits. This is why it is best to prioritize early motion:

    Elevated Possibilities of Acceptance

    Submitting your summary early gives the evaluation committee ample time to completely consider your work and supply constructive suggestions. Early submission permits for potential revisions and enhancements earlier than the ultimate deadline.

    Most well-liked Presentation Time Slots

    Early summary submissions provide you with a greater probability of securing most well-liked presentation time slots. The convention organizers usually accommodate presenters who submit their abstracts early.

    Networking Alternatives

    Attending the convention early lets you join with fellow researchers, professionals, and potential collaborators from the sphere of hospice and palliative medication.

    Skilled Recognition

    Presenting your analysis at a nationally acknowledged convention like AAHPM enhances your skilled profile and showcases your experience in hospice and palliative medication.

    Enhanced Analysis Visibility

    Your summary might be included within the convention proceedings and printed in a peer-reviewed journal, offering wider visibility on your analysis and its potential affect on the sphere.

    Part Timeline
    Summary Submission Deadline March 15, 2025
    Early Submission Incentive Deadline November 1, 2024

    To make sure a profitable summary submission, contemplate the next timeline and incentives:

    Collaborating on Multi-Creator Abstracts: Ideas for Success

    1. Set up Clear Roles and Obligations

    Outline every creator’s contributions, together with information assortment, writing particular sections, and enhancing. Assign timelines and guarantee all members are conscious of their duties.

    2. Talk Successfully

    Use common communication channels resembling e-mail, telephone, or video conferencing. Talk about concepts, present suggestions, and deal with any issues or questions promptly.

    3. Use Collaborative Writing Instruments

    Think about using instruments resembling Google Docs or Dropbox to facilitate real-time collaboration and monitoring adjustments. This enables a number of authors to work on the summary concurrently.

    4. Respect Views and Opinions

    Acknowledge that every creator’s perspective and experience might differ. Worth their enter and work collectively to seek out frequent floor whereas sustaining a respectful {and professional} setting.

    5. Search Suggestions Early and Typically

    Share drafts with colleagues, mentors, or different summary reviewers to acquire useful suggestions. This helps establish areas for enchancment and ensures the summary is well-written and compelling.

    6. Proofread Rigorously Earlier than Submission

    Proofread the ultimate summary meticulously for any errors in grammar, spelling, and formatting. Take note of consistency in fashion, citations, and references. Contemplate asking a trusted colleague to evaluation the summary for a further perspective.

    Selling Range and Inclusion in Summary Submissions

    Illustration of Underrepresented Teams

    Encourage submissions from authors from various backgrounds, together with racial and ethnic minorities, girls, LGBTQ+ people, and people with disabilities.

    Inclusive Language and Terminology

    Present clear pointers for authors to make use of inclusive language and terminology that respects all identities and experiences.

    Accessibility

    Make sure that the summary submission platform is accessible to people with disabilities by offering different codecs and assistive applied sciences.

    Bias Mitigation

    Make use of methods to mitigate bias within the evaluation course of, resembling blind peer evaluation or coaching reviewers on variety and inclusion.

    Mentorship and Assist

    Supply mentorship applications and help methods for authors from underrepresented teams to reinforce their summary submission expertise.

    Focused Outreach

    Actively attain out to potential authors from various backgrounds by means of focused promoting and partnerships with organizations representing these teams.

    Range and Inclusion Committee

    Set up a devoted variety and inclusion committee to observe progress, present steering, and deal with any challenges associated to selling variety and inclusion in summary submissions.

    Range and Inclusion Committee Obligations
    – Monitor illustration of underrepresented teams in summary submissions

    – Evaluation and replace language and terminology pointers

    – Collaborate with IT to make sure platform accessibility

    – Develop and implement bias mitigation methods

    – Present mentorship and help for authors from various backgrounds

    – Monitor and report on progress towards variety and inclusion targets

    – Tackle any challenges or issues associated to variety and inclusion

    Case Research: Examples of Excessive-High quality Abstracts

    1. Introduction

    Abstracts ought to present a concise overview of analysis tasks and needs to be written in a transparent and concise method. Excessive-quality abstracts are well-written, informative, and interesting. They precisely symbolize the analysis venture and its findings.

    2. Goal of Case Research

    Case research can be utilized for example how a specific idea or idea works in observe. They can be used to check and distinction completely different approaches to an issue.

    ### 3. Standards for Excessive-High quality Case Research

    Excessive-quality case research are:


    • Properly-written and straightforward to grasp.

    • Based mostly on strong analysis.

    • Related to the subject of the summary.

    • Thought-provoking and insightful.

    4. Deciding on a Case Research

    When choosing a case examine, you will need to contemplate the next elements:


    • The relevance of the case examine to the summary.

    • The standard of the analysis that was performed.

    • The provision of knowledge.

    5. Writing a Case Research Summary

    An summary for a case examine ought to embrace the next data:


    • A short description of the case examine.

    • The analysis strategies that had been used.

    • The findings of the analysis.

    • The implications of the analysis.

    6. Instance of a Excessive-High quality Case Research Summary

    Standards Excessive-High quality Summary
    Properly-written and straightforward to grasp The summary is written in a transparent and concise method. It’s simple to comply with and perceive.
    Based mostly on strong analysis The summary relies on strong analysis. The creator cites credible sources and gives proof to help their claims.
    Related to the subject of the summary The summary is related to the subject of the summary. It gives data that’s straight associated to the subject.
    Thought-provoking and insightful The summary is thought-provoking and insightful. It gives new insights into the subject and raises necessary questions.

    Troubleshooting Frequent Challenges: Suggestions and Assist

    Technical Difficulties

    If you happen to encounter technical points whereas submitting your summary, attain out to the AAHPM help crew by way of e-mail or telephone.

    Content material-Associated Suggestions

    Search enter from colleagues, mentors, or friends to enhance the scientific rigor and readability of your summary’s content material.

    Formatting Points

    Consult with the summary submission pointers and seek the advice of with the AAHPM help crew in the event you face challenges with formatting.

    Content material Overload

    Make sure that your summary concisely conveys the important thing factors and doesn’t exceed the phrase restrict.

    Summary Submission Deadline

    Concentrate on the summary submission deadline and plan accordingly to keep away from last-minute rushes.

    Plagiarism and Moral Issues

    Make sure that your summary is unique work and adheres to moral pointers for analysis and publication.

    Suggestions and Assist Desk

    Contact Methodology Assist
    Electronic mail aahpm@help.org
    Telephone (800) 555-1212

    Summary Analysis and Resolution Course of

    The summary analysis course of is rigorous and includes knowledgeable reviewers assessing your work’s scientific benefit, originality, and relevance to the convention theme.

    Notification of Summary Acceptance

    AHPM will notify you of the summary acceptance or rejection choice by way of e-mail. Reviewers’ suggestions can also be supplied for accepted abstracts.

    Embracing Innovation in Summary Submission: Instruments and Sources

    Streamlined Submission Course of

    Superior submission portals permit authors to seamlessly navigate by means of the summary submission course of, guaranteeing a hassle-free expertise.

    Interactive Modifying and Collaboration

    Collaborate seamlessly with co-authors by means of real-time enhancing and monitoring instruments inside the submission platform.

    Enhanced Formatting and Preview

    Interactive formatting instruments and preview choices allow authors to visualise their abstracts earlier than submission, guaranteeing adherence to pointers.

    Dynamic Subject Matching

    Clever algorithms analyze summary content material and recommend related subjects and key phrases for optimum visibility and reviewer project.

    Customizable Submission Kinds

    Tailor summary submission kinds to particular convention necessities, capturing important data whereas streamlining the evaluation course of.

    Bulk Submission Choices

    Facilitate environment friendly submission for big groups or establishments by enabling bulk add of a number of abstracts concurrently.

    AI-Powered Textual content Evaluation

    Make the most of AI-powered instruments to research summary content material, offering insights into developments and figuring out frequent themes and areas for enchancment.

    Personalised Submission Monitoring

    Authors can observe the standing of their submissions in real-time, receiving e-mail notifications and accessing detailed progress updates.

    On-line Evaluation Administration

    Built-in evaluation administration methods allow reviewers to guage abstracts effectively, entry reviewer pointers, and supply tailor-made suggestions.

    Complete Reporting and Analytics

    Analyze summary submission information to realize useful insights into convention dynamics, creator participation, and trending analysis areas.

    Device Function
    Submission Portal Interactive submission course of, collaboration instruments
    Formatting Instruments Actual-time preview, customizable templates
    AI Textual content Evaluation Pattern identification, theme extraction
    On-line Evaluation Administration Environment friendly evaluation entry, reviewer pointers, suggestions provision
    Reporting and Analytics Submission information evaluation, insights into convention developments

    Aahpm Summary Submission 2025

    The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medication (AAHPM) is now accepting summary submissions for its 2025 Annual Assembly. The assembly might be held in San Diego, California, from October 1-4, 2025.

    The AAHPM Annual Assembly is the biggest gathering of hospice and palliative medication professionals on this planet. The assembly gives a chance for attendees to be taught concerning the newest analysis, greatest practices, and coverage points within the area.

    Abstracts are invited on a variety of subjects associated to hospice and palliative medication, together with:

    • Medical care
    • Analysis
    • Training
    • Coverage
    • Ethics

    AAHPM encourages submissions from a various vary of views, together with clinicians, researchers, educators, policymakers, and advocates.

    Individuals Additionally Ask About Aahpm Summary Submission 2025

    When is the deadline for summary submissions?

    The deadline for summary submissions is March 1, 2025.

    What are the factors for summary submissions?

    Abstracts needs to be not more than 500 phrases and may embrace:

    • A transparent and concise title
    • An announcement of the issue or speculation
    • An outline of the strategies used
    • A abstract of the outcomes
    • A dialogue of the implications of the findings

    How are abstracts reviewed?

    Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of consultants in hospice and palliative medication. The reviewers will assess the abstracts primarily based on their originality, significance, and relevance to the sphere.